Postgraduate Prizes
*More details to follow*
The winners of the 2007 prize were:
Phd Prize:
Andrew Currah
(Cambridge now at Oxford) "The Internet gift economy: a study of socio-technological change in the US film industry" [
View abstract
]
The Internet gift economy: a study of socio-technological change in the US film industry
Andrew Currah
In this thesis, I critically examine the impact of a 'disruptive' technology on a mature and concentrated industry; that is, an assemblage of technologies, which, through their social development and application, have facilitated a new mode of economic reproduction, thereby changing the kinds of products that are sold and in turn, the way firms generate revenues. Specifically, I construct an economic geography of this 'sociotechnological' disruption; and therefore assess where it came from, how it evolved, and how it is being incorporated into the economic geography of the industry. In doing so, I focus on the response of key individuals and firms in the industry. My analysis rests on two general assumptions: first, I contend that behaviour must be understood in relation to incentives; and second, I also contend that behaviour and incentives are shaped and rationalized by the broader geographic and organizational context in which decision-making takes place. Using these pointers, my aim in this thesis is to construct an active, contextually sensitive and agent-specific account of a technological disruption.
I approach these issues through the lens of a specific case study, based on an extended period of fieldwork in Los Angeles: the development of the Internet gift economy in the context of the US film industry. Although specific in its focus, this geographically bounded case study sheds light on a broader theoretical picture, concerning the changing shape of the 'media and entertainment industries' in a digital and networked economic environment. The Internet lies at the heart of a rapidly evolving sociotechnological architecture, which is bringing about profound changes to the production, distribution and consumption of information-based commodities, such as books, music, film and television programming. Specifically, the Internet represents a type of 'gift economy' in which substantively new forms of collaboration, participation and sharing are beginning to blossom. Crucially, the Internet gift economy facilitates a new mode of economic reproduction, built around file sharing in a peer-to-peer architecture, which has considerable benefits both for copyright owners and consumers in the media and entertainment industries.
The thesis addresses three research questions, which evaluate the response of three groups in the US film industry: consumers, producers and innovators. The first concerns the socio-cultural origins and nature of the technological disruption: to what extent has the Internet gift economy refigured consumer behaviour, and thereby destabilized the economic reproduction of the US film industry, namely its leading oligopolistic producers, the studios? The second concerns the oligopolistic response to the disruption: in what way has the studio oligopoly responded to the Internet gift economy, and to what extent has its behaviour been limited by the prevailing organizational and institutional structure of the film industry? And finally, the third question concerns the commercial development of the disruption: namely, what is the relative role of the film industry's lead producers and other innovators in the exploration and commercial exploitation of this new market; and in what ways does the development of the Internet gift economy affect the competitive structure of the industry?
Throughout the thesis, I develop a central argument, which rests on two points: first, that file sharing in the Internet gift economy can be given a legal and flexible structure; and second, that in this form file sharing has the potential to strengthen the economic reproduction of the media and entertainment industries, including the dominant oligopoly. However, I argue that the Internet gift economy has elicited very different responses from producers and innovators in the film industry, because of differences in incentives and the context in which decision-making takes place. I contend that the studios are institutionally unable to explore the commercial potential of the Internet gift economy; but that they will ultimately be essential to the longterm exploitation of this new outlet for films. Going forward, I suggest that the studio oligopoly will retain its dominant position in the industry, but will also face heightened levels of competition in niche markets as a direct result of the Internet gift economy, which facilitates the accurate matching of supply and demand and therefore enables consumers to access a much wider array of relevant, engaging and otherwise invisible creative work.
Masters:
Pedro Marques
(CURDS, Newcastle) "Regional paths to the knowledge economy: can all regions be knowledge based?" [
View abstract
]
Regional paths to the knowledge economy: can all regions be knowledge based?
Pedro Marques
In the last decades the knowledge economy concept has moved to the forefront of scientific and policy debates. However many questions have been raised about how much is 'new' in the 'new economy'. From the point of view of economic geography some issues have also been raised: can the structures of a few relatively successful regions, that have been widely studied, be replicated everywhere? If innovation and learning are seen as a source of empowerment for firms and workers alike, how can we explain increasing territorial and social inequalities? Departing from a critique of the knowledge economy thesis and of the concepts that it derived in economic geography, this research builds on the concept of Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) to question if all regions can become successful RIS. It does so by looking at two case studies: the North East, UK and Centro region, Portugal. Two main conclusions are reached: that such concepts must move away from inward looking perspectives and link the prospects of regions with their national and international contexts; and that to build innovative and relatively successful regions one-size-fits-all models must be abandoned.
The winners of the 2006 prize were:
Phd Prize:
James Faulconbridge
(Loughborough, now Lancaster) "Local-global geographies of tacit knowledge production in London and New York's advertising and law professional service firms"
Masters:
Will Harvey
(Cambridge) "Highly-skilled migration: An analysis of immigrant networks in biotechnology"
The winners of the 2005 prize were:
Phd Prize:
Jennifer Johns
(Manchester). "Tracing the connections: Manchester's film and television industry"
Best MA Dissertation:
Riccardo Crescenzi
, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Dipartimento Di Economia, "Innovation and regional growth in the Enlarged Europe: the role of local innovative capabilities, peripherality and education".
The winners of the 2004 prize were:
Phd Prize:
Alan James
(Cambridge). "Regional culture, corporate strategy, and high tech innovation: Salt Lake City"
MA Prize:
Marion Traub-Werner
, "Free trade and the performance of neo-liberalism".
The winners of the 2003 prize were:
Best conference paper in economic geography:
No award
.
Best published paper in economic geography:
No award
.
Travel award:
Jane Holgate
, (QMW).
The winners of the 2002 prize were:
Best conference paper in economic geography:
No award
.
Best published paper in economic geography:
No award
.
Travel award:
Martin Bickl
, (Durham).
The winners of the 2001 prize were:
Best conference paper in economic geography:
Anthony Vigor
, (Manchester).
Best published paper in economic geography:
Danny MacKinnon
, (Aberdeen).
Travel award:
No award
The winners of the 2000 prize were:
Best conference paper in economic geography:
No award
.
Best published paper in economic geography:
No award
.
Travel award:
Steve Wood
, (Southampton) to travel to AAG in Pittsburgh.
The winners of the 1999 prize were:
Best conference paper in economic geography:
Paul Bennett
, (Oxford).
Best published paper in economic geography:
Martin Jones
, (Aberystwyth).
Travel award:
No award
.
The winners of the 1998 prize were:
Best conference paper in economic geography:
Karen Bakker
, (Oxford).
Best published paper in economic geography:
Henry Yeung
, (N U Singapore).
Travel awards:
Andrew Lincoln
(Southampton),
Adam Holden
(Manchester) and
Anna Davies
(Manchester) All to attend the AAG in Boston.
The winners for 1997 were:
Best conference paper in economic geography:
Christian Berndt
, Cambridge and
Shaun French
, (Bristol).
Best published paper in economic geography:
Neil Coe
, (Durham).
Travel awards:
Mike Raco
, Royal Holloway (to visit the USA),
Kevin Ward
, (Manchester) to visit Ireland.